Consistency Is a Perception Skill
Why better reps beat more reps—and how to train smart, even on your own
"If your flag pulls only work sometimes, the problem isn’t your hands. It’s what your eyes didn’t see—three steps earlier."
Consistency isn’t about repeating drills until you’re blue in the face. It’s about creating reps that matter. That teach. That transfer. And that’s possible—even when you’re training solo, even when you’re in the wrong sport, even when you think you don’t have what you need.
Let me show you how.
3 Key Takeaways:
Consistency is not a discipline problem. It’s a perception-and-timing problem rooted in poor rep design.
PATE shows you what kind of rep you’re doing. PICOD shows you what’s inside it—and how to fix it.
Even solo practice can transfer—if it’s built with decision, cues, and constraint in mind.
2 Thought-Provoking Questions:
Am I repeating the drill—or the failure?
What’s the smallest tweak I can make to upgrade one rep today?
You hear it all the time: “Just get your reps in.”
It feels true. Repetition has a strong PR team. Coaches preach it. Athletes admire it. Instagram drills glamorize it. But here’s the trap: repeating unrepresentative reps locks in failure—not learning. Some reps are counterfeit. They teach rhythm, not decision. And rhythm won’t save you when the game starts lying to you.
Let’s reframe.
Truth: Consistency Is Adaptability Under Pressure
Consistency means: you perform the right movement at the right moment—again and again, in different situations.
It’s not a mechanical problem. It’s a perceptual one. The most consistent defenders, passers, or finishers aren’t smoother. They’re smarter. They read cues earlier, adjust faster, and trust their timing. It’s why better reps beat more reps. But to build better reps, we need to understand the training environment itself.
Enter the PATE Matrix
Think of the PATE Matrix as a compass for training design. It tells you what kind of rep you’re doing:
Perceive → Act: Is the drill based on real decisions and movement?
Athlete-centered: Is it tailored or generic?
Tactical Load: Is there real cognitive complexity?
Engagement Format: Solo, partner, or team?
In short: PATE tells you what kind of learning your session invites. And solo training? That’s almost always E1—the lowest level of Engagement in the PATE Matrix. But Engagement here doesn’t just mean group size—it reflects the interaction demands of the rep:
E1: Detached—no interaction, just movement execution.
E2: Open space—movement in response to space, but not directly against another player.
E3: Leverage-based—opponents or teammates are present, and your movement shapes or is shaped by their position.
E4: Close proximity—constant interaction under tight spatial and temporal constraints, just like in real games.
Solo reps almost always fall into E1—detached, self-paced, low interaction. Which means we’re missing live complexity. But even in E1, if we increase the Tactical Load using PICOD, we can still simulate key parts of the game. That’s how we make Option B the best it can be.
From PATE to PICOD: Reverse-Engineer What’s Missing
Once you’ve diagnosed your training setup with PATE, PICOD helps you upgrade it—by mapping directly to the Tactical Load axis and pinpointing which real-game demands are missing from your reps identifying what’s missing, and what you can still make tactical. PICOD is the Tactical Load engine inside PATE:
Pressure – Was I under stress, time, or fatigue?
Information – Was I reacting to a real-time cue (visual, auditory), not just executing a plan?
Coordination – Did I sync with teammates, zones, or positional constraints?
Opponent – Was there unpredictability, opposition, or feints?
Decision – Did I have to choose between realistic options?
Every drill you run—or rep you repeat—either trains these five tactical demands, or it doesn’t. Use PICOD as your lens: if you're not training Pressure, Information, Coordination, Opponent response, or Decisions, you're not building transfer—you’re just moving. This is your moment to troubleshoot reps with the same urgency you bring to game day.
So let’s show how PICOD helps you work smarter.
Case: Making Solo Work Count (Flag Football Defender)
A 15-year-old defender from an elite flag football team messages me: he just made the extended roster, but still needs to prove he belongs. The coaches want more consistency in his flag pulls. His technique is solid—but not reliable enough. And now, during the off-season, he's playing tackle, where he gets zero flag reps. He's anxious about falling behind, afraid he can’t prepare. But he reaches out with purpose. We rarely work together in person—he’s in another state—but he trusts me to help him figure this out.
His solution? “I just need more reps.”
Mine? “You need better reps.”
We used PICOD to break it down:
P: No consequence. No fatigue. No stress.
I: He lacked meaningful perceptual reps—no hips, tempo, or hesitation cues to read.
C: He trained solo. No teammates to sync angles or isolate runners with.
O: No live opposition—only cones and ghosts.
D: He wasn’t forced to decide when to commit.
So I built him this plan, which obviously is based on a lot of imagination and visualization:
Video Drill: Watch 10 clips of national teams, pause before the cut, predict where to pull. Log errors.
Chase Drill: Simulate game angles with cones. Finish in a low base, no lunging or reaching.
Sticky Hands: Use a moving rope or towel to simulate swing-timing and contact.
Fatigue Circuit: 15s shuttle, push-ups, then 3 “phantom pulls.”
Mental Transfer: During tackle reps, imagine the runner’s belt position. Read hips. Simulate the pull.
That athlete will not get to pull flags for weeks and months. But we help him train his eyes—not just his hands. His decision-making should improve, to gain consistency. So he learned how to troubleshoot his situation like an experienced coach. We gave him a plan and a framework to follow. Whether it works? We’ll see. But if nothing else, he’ll walk into his next flag game having trained with intention—not just wishful thinking or fear of failure.
Smart Rep Checklist (Use This Today)
Next time you train—alone, or with a team—ask:
Pressure: Did time, fatigue, or consequence shape the rep?
Information: Did I react to something live or variable?
Coordination: Was I syncing with space, teammates, or game roles?
Opponent: Did I face something unpredictable?
Decision: Did I have to choose between real options?
If the answer is no to most of these? You’re not wasting time. You’re just training Option B. So make Option B smarter.
Final Word: Don’t Just Practice—Diagnose
If consistency is your problem, don’t double your reps.
Double your clarity. Double your standards. Learn to read your drills the way you read the game. That’s what the best do.
You don’t need 500 more reps. You need 15 better ones—and the courage to pay attention when no one’s watching.
And if you’re already doing that? You’re closer to consistency than you think.
Resources
Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to stay updated on deeper insights about navigating change in both business and sports.
Why not work with Rolf?
Rolf is a seasoned performance coach and coach developer, with a unique perspective that challenges conventional thinking. He works across both the business and sports worlds, supporting teams and individuals through change. Currently, he coaches multiple teams and provides personalized guidance to leaders in both fields.
📌 PS: If you found this post helpful, would you please consider restacking it and sharing it with your audience? This post is public, so feel free to share and forward it.
LinkedIn
Instagram
Email: info@flag-academy.com
Email: rolf@beyondchampionships.eu
Facebook: Coaching Beyond Championships